Store
|
Contributing Editors
|
Help
|
Contact
|
Sign In
select
All
Images Only
Search
home
resources
images
handouts
videos
quizzes
boardreview
atoz
< Current issue
Dermatopathology: Practical & Conceptual January - March 2001
>
Evolution In Thinking: Criteria for Histopathologic Diagnosis of Melanoma, 1947–2000: A Critique in Historical Perspective
Mary Aldrene L. Tan, M.D.
A. Bernard Ackerman, M.D.
Introduction
Becker and Obermayer
Ormsby and Montgomery
Lever
Allen
Percival, Montgomery, and Dodds
Montgomery
Pinkus and Mehregan
Wayte
Clark and Mihm
Milne
Smith
Sanderson
Smith
Price, Rywlin, and Ackerman
Pinkus and Mehregan
Ackerman and Su
Kamino and Ackerman
Domonkos, Arnold, and Odom
Roses, Harris, and Ackerman
MacKie
Okun, Edelstein, and Fisher
McCarthy
et al.
Clark
Kirkham
Weedon and Strutton
Fitzpatrick
et al.
Murphy
Mehregan
et al.
Weedon
Elder and Elenitsas
Barnhill
Langley, Fitzpatrick, and Sober
Langley
et al.
Maize
et al.
Dewan and Ackerman
Farmer and Hood
Conclusion
SEE ALSO
-
melanoma
<
Previous
|
Next
>
Montgomery
"One sees [in early melanoma] large atypical cells with relatively little pigment or even with mitotic figures, but apparently they still are confined within the epidermis."
Montgomery H.
Dermatopathology.
New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1967:1175.
Brief Critique
The three findings do not permit a melanoma
in situ
to be distinguished from some examples of Spitz's nevus confined to epidermal and adnexal epithelium.
<
Previous
|
Next
>
This site is made possible in part by:
Copyright © Derm101.com. All Rights Reserved.