Store
|
Contributing Editors
|
Help
|
Contact
|
Sign In
select
All
Images Only
Search
home
resources
images
handouts
videos
quizzes
boardreview
atoz
< Current issue
Dermatopathology: Practical & Conceptual January - March 2001
>
Evolution In Thinking: Criteria for Histopathologic Diagnosis of Melanoma, 1947–2000: A Critique in Historical Perspective
Mary Aldrene L. Tan, M.D.
A. Bernard Ackerman, M.D.
Introduction
Becker and Obermayer
Ormsby and Montgomery
Lever
Allen
Percival, Montgomery, and Dodds
Montgomery
Pinkus and Mehregan
Wayte
Clark and Mihm
Milne
Smith
Sanderson
Smith
Price, Rywlin, and Ackerman
Pinkus and Mehregan
Ackerman and Su
Kamino and Ackerman
Domonkos, Arnold, and Odom
Roses, Harris, and Ackerman
MacKie
Okun, Edelstein, and Fisher
McCarthy
et al.
Clark
Kirkham
Weedon and Strutton
Fitzpatrick
et al.
Murphy
Mehregan
et al.
Weedon
Elder and Elenitsas
Barnhill
Langley, Fitzpatrick, and Sober
Langley
et al.
Maize
et al.
Dewan and Ackerman
Farmer and Hood
Conclusion
SEE ALSO
-
melanoma
<
Previous
|
Next
>
Conclusion
A reader who returns to the statement quoted at the beginning of this essay should now be able to assess better the legitimacy of it:
" . . . no significant changes in histologic criteria had occurred over time that would explain the rise in melanoma incidence."
Rigel DS, Friedman RJ, Kopf AW
et al.
The incidence of malignant melanoma in the United States: Issues as we approach the 21st century.
JAAD
1996;34:83947.
We are compelled to conclude that that statement is plainly untrue.
From the Ackerman Academy of Dermatopathology in New York City where Dr. Tan is a Visiting Fellow from the Philippines and Dr. Ackerman is Director.
<
Previous
|
Next
>
This site is made possible in part by:
Copyright © Derm101.com. All Rights Reserved.