Store
|
Contributing Editors
|
Help
|
Contact
|
Sign In
select
All
Images Only
Search
home
resources
images
handouts
videos
quizzes
boardreview
atoz
< Current issue
Dermatopathology: Practical & Conceptual July - September 2001
>
Evolution in Thinking: Criteria for Clinical Diagnosis of Melanoma, 1947–2000: A Critique in Historical Perspective
Mary Aldrene L. Tan, M.D.
A. Bernard Ackerman, M.D.
Introduction
Becker and Obermayer
Ormsby and Montgomery
Lever
Sulzberger and Wolf
Pillsbury, Shelley, and Kligman
Fitzpatrick and Clark
Lewis and Wheeler
Wayte
Domonkos
Sanderson
Borrie
Clark
Sneddon
Meara
Fry
Sauer
Callen, Stawiski, and Voorhees
Roenigk
Ackerman
McGovern
Roses, Harris, and Ackerman
Dobson and Abele
Ackerman
Ackerman
Friedman, Rigel, and Kopf
Fitzpatrick, Rhodes, Sober, and Mihm
Koh and Rogers
McCarthy et al.
Habif
MacKie
Marks
Mooi WJ and Krausy
Fitzpatrick, Milton, Balch, Shaw, McCarthy, and Sober
National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference
Levine
Holzle, Kind, Plewig, and Burgdorf
Moynihan
Epstein
Marghoob, Slade, Kopf, Rigel, and Friedman
Arndt, Wintroub, Robinson, and LeBoit
Elder and Elenitsas
Barnhill
Maize et al.
Langley, Fitzpatrick, and Sober
Sagebiel
Farmer and Hood
Fleischer, Feldman, Katz, and Clayton
Ackerman, Kerl, Sánchez, et al.
References
SEE ALSO
-
melanoma
<
Previous
|
Next
>
References
1. Tan MAL, Ackerman AB. Criteria for histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma, 19472000: A critique in historical perspective.
Dermatopathology: Practical & Conceptual
2001;7(1):3953.
2. Clark WH Jr. Malignant melanoma
in situ. Hum Pathol,
1990;21:11978.
3. Ackerman AB. No one should die of melanoma.
JAAD,
1985;12:1156.
<
Previous
|
Next
>
This site is made possible in part by:
Copyright © Derm101.com. All Rights Reserved.