Store
|
Contributing Editors
|
Help
|
Contact
|
Sign In
select
All
Images Only
Search
home
resources
images
handouts
videos
quizzes
boardreview
atoz
< Current issue
Dermatopathology: Practical & Conceptual January - March 2002
>
New Concept: Melanomas in Prepubescent Children: Review Comprehensively, Critique Historically, Criteria Diagnostically, and Course Biologically
Joan M. Mones, D.O.
A. Bernard Ackerman, M.D.
Abstract
Definition of “Prepubescent” and of Proven “Melanomas” for Purposes of This Treatise
Historical Perspective: Darier and A. Civatte, 1910
Historical Perspective: Coe, 1925; Pack and Anglem, 1939
Historical Perspective: Pack et al., 1947; L. Ackerman and del Regato, 1947
Historical Perspective: Pack, 1948; MacDonald, 1948
Historical Perspective: Spitz, 1948
Historical Perspective: Allen, 1949
Historical Perspective: Spitz, 1951; Pack and Scharnagel, 1951
Historical Perspective: Truax and Allen, 1953; Allen and Spitz, 1953
Historical Perspective: Becker, 1954; McWhorter and Woolner, 1954
Historical Perspective: McWhorter et al., 1954; Hendrix, 1954; Dobson, 1955
Historical Perspective: Allen, 1960
Historical Perspective: Hoagland and Hughes, 1960
Historical Perspective: Pontius and Dziabis, 1961; McGovern and Goulston, 1963
Historical Perspective: Giersten, 1964; Kopf and Andrade, 1966
Historical Perspective: Responses of Allen to Kopf and Andrade, 1966
Historical Perspective: Skov-Jensen et al., 1966; Zwaveling et al., 1966; Saksela and Rintala, 1968
Historical Perspective: Lerman et al., 1970
Historical Perspective: Trozak et al., 1975; Shanon et al., 1976
Historical Perspective: Helwig, 1975
Historical Perspective: Speculations of Helwig, 1975
Historical Perspective: Boddie, et al., 1978
Historical Perspective: Stomberg, 1979; Pratt et al., 1981
Historical Perspective: Flemming and Ruggins, 1985; Bader et al., 1985
Historical Perspective: Peters and Goellner, 1986
Historical Perspective: Moss and Briggs, 1986; Melnick et al., 1986; Chapman et al., 1987
Historical Perspective: Donner et al., 1988
Historical Perspective: Fisher et al., 1988
Historical Perspective: K. Smith et al., 1989: “Malignant Spitz’s Nevus”
Historical Perspective: Partoff et al., 1989; Roth et al., 1990
Historical Perspective: Allen, 1991
Historical Perspective: Temple et al., 1991
Historical Perspective: Crotty et al., 1992
Historical Perspective: A. H. Mehregan and D. A. Mehregan, 1993
Historical Perspective: Tate et al., 1993
Historical Perspective: Chun et al., 1993; Bartoli et al., 1994; Nitta et al., 1995
Historical Perspective: Barnhill et al., 1995
Historical Perspective: Barnhill et al., 1995: “Metastasizing Spitz’s Tumor”
Historical Perspective: Barnhill et al., 1995: “Atypical Spitz Tumor”
Historical Perspective: Lartigau et al., 1995
Historical Perspective: Whiteman et al., 1995; Handfield-Jones and N. Smith, 1996
Historical Perspective: Spatz et al., 1996; Naasan et al., 1996
Historical Perspective: Scalzo et al., 1997; Eady, 1997; Crotty, 1997; Zhu et al., 1997
Historical Perspective: Wu and Lambert, 1997; Milton et al., 1997
Historical Perspective: Spatz and Avril, 1998
Historical Perspective: Barnhill, 1998; Spatz and Barnhill, 1999
Historical Perspective: Barnhill et al., 1999
Historical Perspective: Rapini, 1999
Historical Perspective: Strojan and Lamovec, 2000; Davis, 2000; Neville et al., 2000
Historical Perspective: Kogut et al., 2000; Patterson et al., 2000; Zuckerman et al., 2001
Historical Perspective: Conti et al., 2001; Fabrizi and Massi, 2001
Summary: Major Sources of Error in Interpretation
Summary: Major Errors of Pack, Spitz, and Allen
Summary: Major errors of Helwig, K. Smith, and Barnhill
Our Experience
Clinical Appearance
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 18
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 19
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 20
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 21
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 22
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 23
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 24
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 25
)
Differences Histopathologically Between Melanomas in Prepubescents and in Postpubescents: Scanning Magnification
Differences Histopathologically Between Melanomas in Prepubescents and Postpubescents: Higher Magnification
Histopathologic Differential Diagnosis
Biologic Behavior
Synthesis
Purpose of This Endeavor and the Essence of the Message
Conclusions
Addendum and Caveat
Postscript
Acknowledgements
References
SEE ALSO
-
melanoma
<
Previous
|
Next
>
Historical Perspective: Tate et al., 1993
Children and adolescents 20 years of age or less with cutaneous melanoma were reported on by Tate and coworkers in an article published in 1993 titled, "Melanoma in childhood and adolescence: Clinical and pathologic features of 48 cases."
50
The study spanned a 23-year period between January 1968 and August 1991, and was carried out in the Division of Surgical Oncology at the University of Illinois. Fourteen children were considered to be "preadolescent," i.e., 13 years of age and younger, and 34 were "adolescent", i.e., older than 13 but less than 20 years of age. Twenty-one of the 48 melanomas were said to be associated with a nevus, five of those nevi being designated "congenital." At the time of diagnosis, four children were receiving exogenous hormone therapy, namely, a 4-year-old boy on thyroxine for congenital hypothyroidism, a 10-year-old girl on estrogen replacement because of a hysterectomy and bilateral oopherectomy for a congenital malformation, and two 19-year-old girls on oral contraceptives. Tate and coworkers showed only high power photomicrographs and those being of the melanomas in two children, one in a 10-year-old boy with albinism that metastasized to an inguinal lymph node, and the other in a 12-year-old girl whose "nodular" melanoma was diagnosed at first as Spitz's nevus and in whom "massive inguinal metastases" developed 14 years later, resulting in her death the following year. A 4-year-old girl developed a melanoma in association with a giant hairy nevus and that malignant neoplasm metastasized to the brain, causing her to succumb in four months.
The experience with these children led Tate and coworkers to come to these conclusions:
"The pathological features of melanoma in this age group are different from those in adults in several aspects. Acral lentiginous and lentigo maligna melanoma did not occur in this series . . . Antecedent nevi (five congenital) were seen in almost half of our young patients, including both infants in the series."
Because two of their patients (patients #4 and #7) had melanomas that were interpreted histopathologically as Spitz's nevi and yet metastasized with fatal consequences, Tate et al. offered these thoughts about the differentiation histopathologically of Spitz's nevus from melanoma:
"It appears that Spitz's nevi and melanoma have similar features, and no single criterion is reliable in distinguishing the two lesions in young patients. The following features are associated with melanoma: higher degree of pagetoid spread of the tumor into the overlying epidermis, cellular pleomorphism, nuclear hyperchromatism, and increased mitotic activity."
We concur with Tate and coworkers that melanomas may have histopathologic findings in common with those of Spitz's nevus and that the distinction of melanoma from Spitz's nevus may at times be exceedingly difficult. We do not agree, however, that melanomas "have a higher degree of pagetoid spread of the tumor into the overlying dermis, cellular pleomorphism, nuclear hyperchromatism, and increased mitotic activity." Pagetoid melanocytes themselves are seen often in melanomas and practically never in Spitz's nevi, but pagetoid pattern of melanocytes within the epidermis is of no avail in distinguishing the malignant from the benign neoplasm; scatter of abnormal melanocytes throughout the epidermis often is present in both. In the ultimate analysis, the silhouette of the neoplasm as assessed at scanning magnification of a conventional microscope is the surest route to differentiation of melanoma form Spitz's nevus; cytopathologic attributes of the abnormal melanocytes may be helpful to that end, but not invariably.
<
Previous
|
Next
>
This site is made possible in part by:
Copyright © Derm101.com. All Rights Reserved.