Store
|
Contributing Editors
|
Help
|
Contact
|
Sign In
select
All
Images Only
Search
home
resources
images
handouts
videos
quizzes
boardreview
atoz
< Current issue
Dermatopathology: Practical & Conceptual January - March 2002
>
New Concept: Melanomas in Prepubescent Children: Review Comprehensively, Critique Historically, Criteria Diagnostically, and Course Biologically
Joan M. Mones, D.O.
A. Bernard Ackerman, M.D.
Abstract
Definition of “Prepubescent” and of Proven “Melanomas” for Purposes of This Treatise
Historical Perspective: Darier and A. Civatte, 1910
Historical Perspective: Coe, 1925; Pack and Anglem, 1939
Historical Perspective: Pack et al., 1947; L. Ackerman and del Regato, 1947
Historical Perspective: Pack, 1948; MacDonald, 1948
Historical Perspective: Spitz, 1948
Historical Perspective: Allen, 1949
Historical Perspective: Spitz, 1951; Pack and Scharnagel, 1951
Historical Perspective: Truax and Allen, 1953; Allen and Spitz, 1953
Historical Perspective: Becker, 1954; McWhorter and Woolner, 1954
Historical Perspective: McWhorter et al., 1954; Hendrix, 1954; Dobson, 1955
Historical Perspective: Allen, 1960
Historical Perspective: Hoagland and Hughes, 1960
Historical Perspective: Pontius and Dziabis, 1961; McGovern and Goulston, 1963
Historical Perspective: Giersten, 1964; Kopf and Andrade, 1966
Historical Perspective: Responses of Allen to Kopf and Andrade, 1966
Historical Perspective: Skov-Jensen et al., 1966; Zwaveling et al., 1966; Saksela and Rintala, 1968
Historical Perspective: Lerman et al., 1970
Historical Perspective: Trozak et al., 1975; Shanon et al., 1976
Historical Perspective: Helwig, 1975
Historical Perspective: Speculations of Helwig, 1975
Historical Perspective: Boddie, et al., 1978
Historical Perspective: Stomberg, 1979; Pratt et al., 1981
Historical Perspective: Flemming and Ruggins, 1985; Bader et al., 1985
Historical Perspective: Peters and Goellner, 1986
Historical Perspective: Moss and Briggs, 1986; Melnick et al., 1986; Chapman et al., 1987
Historical Perspective: Donner et al., 1988
Historical Perspective: Fisher et al., 1988
Historical Perspective: K. Smith et al., 1989: “Malignant Spitz’s Nevus”
Historical Perspective: Partoff et al., 1989; Roth et al., 1990
Historical Perspective: Allen, 1991
Historical Perspective: Temple et al., 1991
Historical Perspective: Crotty et al., 1992
Historical Perspective: A. H. Mehregan and D. A. Mehregan, 1993
Historical Perspective: Tate et al., 1993
Historical Perspective: Chun et al., 1993; Bartoli et al., 1994; Nitta et al., 1995
Historical Perspective: Barnhill et al., 1995
Historical Perspective: Barnhill et al., 1995: “Metastasizing Spitz’s Tumor”
Historical Perspective: Barnhill et al., 1995: “Atypical Spitz Tumor”
Historical Perspective: Lartigau et al., 1995
Historical Perspective: Whiteman et al., 1995; Handfield-Jones and N. Smith, 1996
Historical Perspective: Spatz et al., 1996; Naasan et al., 1996
Historical Perspective: Scalzo et al., 1997; Eady, 1997; Crotty, 1997; Zhu et al., 1997
Historical Perspective: Wu and Lambert, 1997; Milton et al., 1997
Historical Perspective: Spatz and Avril, 1998
Historical Perspective: Barnhill, 1998; Spatz and Barnhill, 1999
Historical Perspective: Barnhill et al., 1999
Historical Perspective: Rapini, 1999
Historical Perspective: Strojan and Lamovec, 2000; Davis, 2000; Neville et al., 2000
Historical Perspective: Kogut et al., 2000; Patterson et al., 2000; Zuckerman et al., 2001
Historical Perspective: Conti et al., 2001; Fabrizi and Massi, 2001
Summary: Major Sources of Error in Interpretation
Summary: Major Errors of Pack, Spitz, and Allen
Summary: Major errors of Helwig, K. Smith, and Barnhill
Our Experience
Clinical Appearance
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 18
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 19
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 20
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 21
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 22
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 23
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 24
)
Histopathologic Findings (
Figure 25
)
Differences Histopathologically Between Melanomas in Prepubescents and in Postpubescents: Scanning Magnification
Differences Histopathologically Between Melanomas in Prepubescents and Postpubescents: Higher Magnification
Histopathologic Differential Diagnosis
Biologic Behavior
Synthesis
Purpose of This Endeavor and the Essence of the Message
Conclusions
Addendum and Caveat
Postscript
Acknowledgements
References
SEE ALSO
-
melanoma
<
Previous
|
Next
>
Historical Perspective: Rapini, 1999
Rapini, in an article in 1999
132
that dealt with the conundrum, "Spitz nevus or melanoma?", offered these thoughts about the subject of "malignant Spitz's nevi:"
" The unfortunate controversial name "malignant Spitz nevus' refers to those that metastasize to regional lymph nodes, yet they are still thought to be benign, because no further dissemination occurs and the patient appears to do well. This is because the presence of melanocytic rests within lymph nodes is not invariable evidence of malignancy. For example, very large congenital melanocytic nevi can be accompanied by apparently benign rests of melanocytes within nodes, and the situation with malignant Spitz nevus is presumed to be similar. However, it is difficult to be certain about the significance of lymph node involvement, and the diagnosis of malignant Spitz nevus remains very controversial. Malignant Spitz nevi in the skin tend to be larger and deeper, with more necrosis, ulceration, cytological atypia, and mitoses than average idealized Spitz nevi."
In these lines, Rapini gave tacit approval to the idea of "malignant Spitz's nevus," a notion that deserves no approval because no such neoplasm exists; so-called malignant Spitz's nevus is a melanoma. Rapini went on to advise about which histopathologic findings he found useful for distinguishing Spitz nevi from melanomas and he did that in these lines:
" . . . Spitz nevi tend to be sharply demarcated in the epidermal component, whereas melanomas often have an intraepidermal radial growth that seems to sputter along for a less distinct distance. Melanomas are more likely to be asymmetric, but exceptions occur, especially in nodular melanomas. The melanocytic cells in the deeper portion of Spitz nevi tend to be smaller and less atypical, and this is often called maturation. . . . Nest size tends to be uniform from side to side in Spitz nevi, and is more variable in melanomas. . . . Mitoses can be seen in both Spitz nevi and melanomas. Mitoses close to the base of the lesion are more common in melanomas. Bizarre or highly abnormal morphologies of mitoses are more often seen in melanomas. Pagetoid melanocytes can be seen in both melanomas as well as Spitz nevi, but they tend to involve single cells rather than nests in melanomas, and in melanomas they tend to spread into the poorly demarcated shoulders of the lesions. . . . The most helpful differentiating features of Spitz nevi are patient age, sharp demarcation, symmetry, maturation of melanocytes at the base, and epithelial hyperplasia."
Although some of the observations of Rapini surely are correct, some, such as those about the age of a patient being a criterion for diagnosis, an intraepidermal radial growth being an attribute of melanoma only, and pagetoid melanocytes being a finding in Spitz's nevi are plain wrong.
<
Previous
|
Next
>
This site is made possible in part by:
Copyright © Derm101.com. All Rights Reserved.